<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Egoless Programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flexbandit.com/archives/104/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flexbandit.com/archives/104</link>
	<description>Yet another Flex enthusiast? You Betcha!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulf</title>
		<link>http://flexbandit.com/archives/104/comment-page-1#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexbandit.com/?p=104#comment-458</guid>
		<description>For PHP devs, here&#039;s one I&#039;ve been eying for a while: https://squadedit.com/. At $35/mo for up to five developers, it looks like a perfect solution for small teams.

Also, here is one I don&#039;t like much, but it&#039;s open source and readily available: http://codedemon.codeplex.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For PHP devs, here&#8217;s one I&#8217;ve been eying for a while: <a href="https://squadedit.com/" rel="nofollow">https://squadedit.com/</a>. At $35/mo for up to five developers, it looks like a perfect solution for small teams.</p>
<p>Also, here is one I don&#8217;t like much, but it&#8217;s open source and readily available: <a href="http://codedemon.codeplex.com/" rel="nofollow">http://codedemon.codeplex.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulf</title>
		<link>http://flexbandit.com/archives/104/comment-page-1#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexbandit.com/?p=104#comment-457</guid>
		<description>We should totally write our own code review tool. I&#039;m not kidding. It&#039;s right along the lines of what good writers need  for critiques.

If Wave had syntax highlighting and some way to mark things completed, I&#039;m thinking it would also make a fine code review system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should totally write our own code review tool. I&#8217;m not kidding. It&#8217;s right along the lines of what good writers need  for critiques.</p>
<p>If Wave had syntax highlighting and some way to mark things completed, I&#8217;m thinking it would also make a fine code review system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
